Kalapani, Lipulek and Limpiyadhura

Dear Indian Friends and especially India Media

Our Nepal was as below map before 1816 A.D 

In this map, you can see our territory was up to Sutlej (including Kangra, Almora, Kumaun of this time lies in India) in the west. In the East, we were up to 2/3 of Sikkim up to the Teesta River.

British East India Company and Nepal fought  2 years from 1814 A.D to 1816 A.D after that there was the treaty of Sugauli the treaty that established the boundary line of Nepal, was signed on 2 December 1815 and ratified by 4 March 1816 between the East India Company and Raj Guru Gajaraj Mishra with Chandra Shekhar Upadhyay for Nepal following the Anglo-Nepalese War of 1814-16.

Treaty of Sagauli, (March 4, 1816), an agreement between the Gurkha chiefs of Nepal and the British Indian government that ended the Anglo-Nepalese (Gurkha) War (1814–16). By the treaty, Nepal renounced all claim to the disputed Terai, or lowland country, and ceded its conquests west of the Kali River and extending to the Sutlej River, East up to Mechi River. The result of the treaty was that Nepal lost almost two-third of its territory on the east, south, and west.

You can read fully about the treaty in any website. After Treaty our map remains Between Kali in West and Mechi in the East. The Sugauli Treaty specifically stated that the Kali was the Western boundary river, with all areas east of it being the nation-state of Nepal, the Kumaon region of British India lying on the other side. The proper boundary, therefore, depends on identifying the Kali to its source. Starting in the 1820s, the British produced maps that identified the main stem of the Kali river as turning northwest at a point deep in the mountains upstream from Garbyang, heading towards the headwaters of Limpiyadhura.

In 1962 A.D. there was a war between India and China at that time there were 17 camps of Indian Military in Himalaya (China side) of Nepal. In the book Border Management of Nepal, Buddhi Narayan Shrestha states that “Indian Armed military-men of the Indian Military Check-posts, deputed on 9 June 1952 in the northern frontier of Nepal, were put away and sent back to India by the Government of Nepal on 20 April 1969”.

Indian Military Check-posts on the Northern Frontier of Nepal (Deployed from 1952 to 1969)

Check-post                               District

1. Tinkar Pass                            Darchula

2. Taklakot                                  Bajhang

3. Muchu                                    Humla

4. Mugugaon                              Mugu

5. Chharkabhot                          Dolpa

6. Kaisang (Chhusang)              Mustang

7. Thorang                                 Manang

8. Larkay Pass                           Gorkha

9. Atharasaya Khola                  Gorkha

10. Somdang                             Rasuwa

11. Rasuwagadhi                       Rasuwa

12. Tatopani (Kodari)                Sindhupalchok

13. Lambagar                            Dolakha

14. Namche (Chyalsa)              Solukhumbu

15. Chepuwa Pass                    Sankhuwasabha

16. Olangchungola                    Taplejung

17. Thaychammu                      Taplejung

18. Chyangthapu                       Panchthar

(Shrestha, 259)

According to Bishwabandu Thapa (still alive), who was the Home Minister during King Mahendra's rule in Nepal in 1962 A.D, Prime Minister Jawaharlal Nehru wrote a personal letter to King Mahendra asking him to let the retreating India Army stay temporarily in an area in Kalapani during the Sino-Indian war. Nepal king help at that time to India as a good neighbor because it was in trouble. King Mahendra's regime was autocratic called the Panchayat system. No one knows what was happening in Nepal at that time. 

Before Democracy in Nepal, no one knows about this issue but after 1990 AD when Nepal became a fully democrat country it takes dialogues with India regarding Kalapani and the other 72 cases of border disputes. All Disputes were solved except Kalapani and Susta. Many meetings were held after 1990 AD. People of India and Indian media also said why Nepal has not raised voice before because we don't know the whole story Now after Democracy we Nepali known all these facts. Below you can see Nepal political map including Limpiyadhura. 

Source Er. Saroj Karki FB Wall

As above you can see the sky blue the color river that originates from Limpiyadhura (Green Circle Part) whose discharge is very much large also is longer than the river flowing from Lipulek (Yellow Circle Part) which is in deep blue. Both meet in Gunji. As per International law it says the Main river is that whose discharge is large and length is also long Now the sky-blue color river is Kali River which is the main river and the river flowing from Lipulekh (Yellow Circle Part) which is in deep blue is its tributary which is also shown in the British India map.

There were three Village of Nepal Gunji, Nabi, and Kuti in between these rivers as shown by the flag in the picture. Now the Red Circle Part is Kalapani where king Mahendra give to India for the month in 1962 A.D as I mention above till the war doesn’t end. But the devious Indian Government make an artificial Kali temple in Lipulekh (Yellow Circle Part) and said the river originates from Kali Temple is the Kali River. Also, they started constructing the road (Redline above figure) up to Lipulekh.

Also, the Census was held on Nepal in 1961 in Three Village Gunji, Nabi & Kuti by Journalist Mr. Bhairav Risal (still alive), who worked as a Nepal government employee for some time, has said that he visited Limpiya Dhura as an enumerator during the 1961 population census. There is still evidence of tax paid by the villagers at that time from the village Gunji, Nabi & Kuti to the Nepal Government.

Below the map is the map of the text book of King Mahendra Regime and the tip portion  shown in red rectangle is same Map which is published by this government.

Now, What do you think Nepal can deceit for this small area of 342 Sq. Km who has lost its 2/3^rd part after Sugauli Treaty.

Nepal political map including Limpiyadhura 

Liquefaction in Nepal Earthquake 2015

After the April 25, 2015 earthquake, a lot of people have realized a very scary fact, a house can’t be made strong enough if the soil it rests is not strong. One of the signs of weak soil is liquefaction during earthquake. In the recent earthquake, we could observe liquefaction in different places in Kathmandu, causing a number of structure to settle and fail.

Liquefaction occurs when vibrations or water pressure within a mass of soil cause the soil particles to lose contact with one another. As a result, the soil behaves like a liquid, has an inability to support weight and can flow down very gentle slopes. This condition is usually temporary and is most often caused by an earthquake vibrating water-saturated fill or unconsolidated soil.

Conditions that Cause Liquefaction

Liquefaction most often occurs when three conditions are met:

1) loose, granular sediment or fill
2) saturation by groundwater
3) strong shaking

After April 25 earthquake and after shocks that followed, water came out of the ground in some places, sand and gravel also came out in some places. These are the signs of liquefaction. This problem was most pronounced in Gongabu area, Balaju, New Bus Park, Machapokhari, and Goldhunga areas. In those areas, some buildings have tilted and others have sunken in the ground. Water and sand had also come out of the ground in Khumaltar area in Lalitpur and Kharipati area in Bhaktapur. Other places of high liquefaction potential are the areas near rivers like Balkhu, Manohara corridor, Bishnumati corridor, and Bagmati corridor.

Similar liquefaction was observed in the 1934 earthquake. The following text is taken from the only official document written about the earthquake by Brahma Shumsher J B Rana.

When compared to the 1934 earthquake, less amount of liquefaction was observed in the 2015 earthquake. Liquefaction is a directly correlated to the duration of the shaking during earthquake.
In a report by Kathmandu Municipality and JAICA in 1998 to 2000, high probability of liquefaction was predicted.

 

Road Damage due to 25th April 2015 EQ in Nepal

 

Liquefaction  in Hetuda due to 25th April 2015 EQ in Nepal

(photo credit: @razzulovely in Twitter)

म भाग्यमा विश्वास गर्दिन !!

भाग्य भगवानको खल्तीबाट दिने उपहार होयिन नकि छैटऔं दिनमा छैटि माताले निधारमा लेखिदिने ब्लुप्रिन्ट ।
भाग्य न निधारमा न चाकमा ठप्पा लागेको हुन्छ न हत्केलाको रेखामा ।  

How the Deadly Nepal Earthquake Happened [Infographic]

By Josh Fischman

April 27, 2015

April 2015 Saturday's terrible earthquake was the latest result of an ongoing collision of giant pieces of our planet, a slow-moving disaster that started about 50 million years ago.

Between 55 million and 40 million years ago, the northern edge of what is now India began to slam into the giant slab of Earth's crust that today carries Nepal and Tibet. This ancient collision had a terrible after-effect this past Saturday: The deadly earthquake, centered in Nepal, which had an estimated death toll of nearly 4,000 people as of Monday evening.

India bulled its way under Nepal those many millions of years ago, shoving the northern land skyward. That move began to create the towering Himalaya, including Mt. Everest. The collision is still going on, as India moves several centimeters north each year, and this has created an unstable fissure in the planet's crust, known as the Himalayan frontal thrust fault. This boundary zone, shown below, continues to release enormous earthquakes. Saturday's magnitude 7.8 disaster appears to overlap a segment that released an 8.1 magnitude quake in 1934, according to Susan Hough, a seismologist with the U.S. Geological Survey in Pasadena, California. That quake killed an estimated 10,700 people.

Here are illustrations that show, first, how the initial collision occurred, then how the thrust fault is continuing to fracture the crust in the area, and finally where the frontal thrust fault lies in relation to other cracks in this very quake-prone zone.




The Himalayas were formed when the Indian lithosphere plate drifted northward and collided with the Eurasian plate. The collision is shown here in simplified, vertically exaggerated diagrams. Some 60 million years ago the oceanic lithosphere at the leading edge of the Indian plate was being sub-ducted under southern Tibet (1). Magma rising above the Indian plate erupted from volcanoes and formed granite intrusions. Sediments and oceanic crust scraped off the descending plate piled up in an accretionary wedge, which created a forearc basin that trapped sediments eroded from Tibet. Sometime between 55 and 40 million years ago the two landmasses collided (2). Presumably the Indian crust was too buoyant to plunge far under Tibet; as a result of a new fault, the Main Central Thrust, broke through the Indian crust. Subsequently, motion continued along the fault (3). A slice of Indian crust, topped by Paleozoic and Mesozoic sediments that had been deposited on the continental shelf, was thrust up onto the oncoming subcontinent. The Accretionary wedge and the forearm sediments were thrust northward onto Tibet. (Much of this material has since been eroded away.) About 20 to 10 million years ago the Main Central Thrust became Inactive. Since then India has slid northward along a second fault, the Main Boundary Fault (4). The second slice of crust has been thrust up onto the subcontinent, lifting up the first slice. The two uplifted slices make up the bulk of the Himalayas; many of the peaks are capped by Paleozoic sediments. The Indian plate bends slightly under the weight of the mountains, and the resulting trough, now filled with sediments, can be detected under the Ganges plain. [Originally produced for "The Structure of Mountain Ranges," by Peter Molnar, in Scientific American, July 1986; Illustration by Ian Worpole].


SHINGLING EFFECTS occur when tectonic plates collide and create thrust faults. Such shingling—the result of the India-Asia plate collision—has occurred in the Himalaya. Faults of a second type are found near the crest of the Himalaya, dipping northward below the Tibetan Plateau. Constituting what is known as the South Tibetan fault system, these faults share geometric similarities with the thrust faults, but rocks slip along this system in the opposite direction. This fault system may also mark the top of the fluid lower crustal channel below Tibet. New evidence suggests that northward slip along the South Tibetan fault system and simultaneous southward slip along the southern faults permit the southward extrusion of this channel toward the Himalayan range front. (Tan regions are moving north. Purple and gray regions are moving south.) [Originally produced for " "Climate and the Evolution of Mountains," By Kip Hodges, in Scientific American, August 2006; Graphic by Jen Christiansen; Source: “Southward Extrusion of Tibetan Crust and its Effect on Himalayan Tectonics," By K. V. Hodges, J. M. Hurtado and K. X. Whipple, in Tectonics, VOL . 20, NO. 6 , pages 799–809; 2001].




Principal Tectonic Features that are thought to be associated with continuing northward push of the India plate against the Eurasia plate have been plotted by the authors, partly on the basis of the analysis of ERTS photographs and partly on the basis of studies of major earthquakes (colored dots), which reveal how the crust has moved along faults. The straight lines without arrowheads through dots indicate thrust faults. The double-headed arrows indicate normal faults. The pairs of anti-parallel arrows indicate movement along strike-slip faults. The areas in color appear to be zones of recent uplift resulting from crustal shortening. The overall impression is that the large Eurasian land mass that lies to the west of 70 degrees east longitude has remained more or less undeformed as China has been pushed to east. [Originally produced for "The Collision between India and Eurasia," By Peter Molnar and Paul Tapponnier, Scientific American, April 1977; Graphics by Andrew Tomko].

हामी नेपाली जन्मे देखि स्वतन्त्र छौ !! हामीलाई कसैको दासत्व स्वीकार छैन !! हामीलाई कसैको परतन्त्र स्वीकार छैन !!

नेपाल भन्ने देश ई.सा को १००० वर्ष पहिला थियो भन्ने कुराको अथर्बबेद लेखेको छ ! हिन्दुहरुको महान पुराण स्कन्ध पुराणको ८१ अध्यायमा नेपाल भन्ने देश उल्लेखित छ र एसको सिमाना पुर्बमा कामरुकमक्ष्य (हाल आसाम) दक्सिनमा पाटालिपुत्र कतुर (हाल पटना) पस्मचिममा कंगारा सम्म थियो अझ हिन्दुले लेखेको स्कन्द पुराण मान्दैनौ भन्नेहरु समुन्द्रगुप्तको ईलाहाबादस्थित सिलालेख गएर पढे हुन्छ तेहा पनि हाम्रो सिमाना माथि उलेखित गरेकै स्थान भनेको छ ! लुम्बिनीको आसोक स्तम्भ निकाल्ने बेलामा सम्राट अशोकले लुम्बिनी यिस्थि शिलालेखमा पनि लेखेका छन् "हिद बुद जाते नेपाल" भनेको यो बुध येहा जन्मेका हुन् र यो देश नेपाल हो भनेर प्रस्ट्यायेका  छन् !! कौटिल्यको अर्थसास्त्र मा पनि नेपाल को बारे उल्लेख गरिएको छ  भने यो पनि पहिला को भारत (भारत बर्स /आयब्रत) जस्तै फुट्दै र जुट्दै थियो !! तेसैले नेपाल परापुर्बकाल देखि नेपालनै थियो !!  

"हामी नेपाली जन्मे देखि स्वतन्त्र छौ !! हामीलाई कसैको दासत्व स्वीकार छैन !! हामीलाई कसैको परतन्त्र स्वीकार छैन !!

पृथिवीबाले त्यो पुरानो नेपाललाइ एकीकरण गरेका हुन् तेसैले ईतिहासलाइ सम्मान गरौ होयिन भने हामीहरुका नातीनातिनाले हामीलाइ धिकार्न बाद्यः हुनेछन !! जय देश नेपाल

जातीय पहिचानका वकालत गर्नेलाइ तर्कसंगत स्पस्ट उत्तर दिन चुनौती

कथित जातीय (पहिचान) संघियताको वकालत गर्ने र भ्रम छर्न दुष्प्रयाश गर्नेहरुलाई मेरो यी सिधा प्रस्न को तर्कसंगत स्पस्ट उत्तर दिन चुनौती :
1) धेरै जनसंख्या भएका ठुला-ठुला र बोल्न सक्ने बिकसित ८-१० जाति को नाम मा नेपाल लै जातीय संघियता मा टुक्र्याउन र बाकि ११५ भन्दा बदी अल्पसंखेक जाति हरुचाही टाउके जातिको राज्यमा एउटा सानो जमिनको टुक्रामा उपस्वयतत्ता को नाम मा बस्नुपर्छ भन्नु कति उचित हो ?
2) ठुला ८-१० टाउको जतिको मात्र स्वार्थको कुरा गरेर कहिँपनि पुगीदैन !! त्यो गर्दा भोलिे के होला भनेर सोच्न पर्दैन ?? अहिले ठुला टाउके जाति ले मिलेर भागबन्डा गरेपनि भोलि ति साना-थोरै जनसंख्या भएका जातिका चेतना र जनसंख्या बढ्दै गएपछि उनीहरुले पनि आफ्नो जातीय राज्य र भाषा अवस्य खोज्छन , नपाए बिद्रोह गर्छन, रगत को खोला बग्छ ! तेतिबेला के गर्ने ? हामि १% भन्दा बढी संख्या भएका ठुला लाइ मात्र जातीय पहिचान चाहिन्छ, सानालाई चाहिदैन भन्न कसरि मिल्छ ? त्यो १% भनेर छुट्याउने आधार के ? ५% भन्यो भने तपाइलाई स्वीकार्य छ ? जातीय पहिचान भन्ने कुरा १% हैन कि १ जना मात्र छ भने पनि उसको पनि जातीय पहिचान पाउनेे अधिकारा उत्तिनै हुन्छ जति तपाई हाम्रो छ ! तेसैले १२५ जातिको नाम मा टुक्र्याउन सम्भब होला ??
3) नाम मात्र खोजेको, जातीय राजय हैन भन्ने कुतर्क गर्ने हो भनेपनि किन आफ्नै जातिको नाम चाहियो ? लिम्बुहरुलाई कथित लिम्बुवानको सत्ता लेप्चावन स्वीकार्य छ ? त्यस्तै कथित ताम्सालिंगले किन चेपांङसालिंग नमान्ने ? कथित नेवा प्रदशको सत्ता पहरी प्रदेश वा च्यामे पोडे प्रदेश स्वीकार्य छ ? अनि कथित तमुवान, मगरात, थारुवान र मदेशको ठाउँमा कुमाल, राउटे, हायु, वा अति पिछडिएका अल्पसंखयक तराईका दलित जातिको नाममा राज्य बनाउन गुरुङ, मगर, थारु वा कथित मधेसी मानिनेहरुले किन नमान्ने ? टाउके जातिहरुलाई आफ्नो जातिको नाम प्यारो छ भने बाकि ११० जातिलाई पनि आफ्नो जातिको नामको राज्य उत्तिनै प्यारो लाग्छ !
4) ति ठुला वा बलिया टाउके जाति ले बोल्ने ८-१० भाषा हरुले सरकारी कामकाजको मान्यता पाउने बितिकै नेपाल मा बोलिने सबै भाषा ले मान्यता पायो भनेर कसरि मान्ने ? बाकि १२० भाषा लै कसरि सरकारी कामकाज मा लाने ? के त्यो सम्भब छ ? कि थोरै जनसंख्या भएका, पिछडिएका, बोल्न नसक्ने हरुको लागि कथित जातीय राज्यमा कुनै स्थान नभए जस्तै भाषा लै पनि मान्यता नदिने ?
5) जातिय पहिचानको कथित राज्यमा १७% देखी ३०% सम्मको जातीय बहुल्याताको आधारमा जातीय पहिचानका राज्य राख्ने हो भने हिन्दु बहुल्याताको आधारमा हिन्दु राज्य बनाउनपर्छ जहा ८५ % भन्दा बदी जनता हिन्दु छन् भन्दा बिरोध गर्ने आधार अनि नैतिकता के हो ?
यसर्थ नेपालमा कथित जातीय पहिचानको संघियता कुनै पनि हालतमा हुनु हुदै हुदैन ! संघियताको बिसयमा जनमत संग्रह गरेर नेपाली जनताको राय लिनुपर्छ ! संघियतामा जानुनै छ भने पनि हरेक प्रान्तले उत्तर दक्छिन छुने गरेर, बिज्ञहरुसंग सल्लाह गरेर नेपाल लाइ आर्थिक रुपमा समृद्धि मा लानसक्ने गरि तटस्थ नाम भएका बढीमा ४ प्रदेश बनाउन पर्छ !
जय नेपाल जय नेपाली

मेरो भोलिको नेपाल-२

नेपाललाई संघ बनाउन तेस प्रदेस को पहिचानको सम्बन्धमा अहिलेको मेरो बुझाईमा एउतै जात बिसेसको एउटा प्रदेश बनाउने  यो ठ्याकै भारत पाकिस्तान छुट्टिन लाग्दा खेरिको जस्तो भयो भारतका मुस्लिमहरु  पाकिस्तान गए पाकिस्तानका हिन्दुहरु भारत आए कति काटमार भयो कतिले ज्यान गुमाए ! कतिले कति ढुख पाए भन्नेकुराको लेखाजोखा भारतमा सूद हुन सकेको छैन ! जे भए नि भारत मा त्यो एउटा कालो ईतिहास को रुपमा अजै जिवितै छ !! बिसेस गरि अहिले नेपालमा मदेस, लिम्बु खम्बुवान, तम्बुवान, मगरातका जनतालाई छुट्टै प्रदेश चायिएको छ भन्ने कुरा सामाजिक संजाल र थुप्रै प्रकासित लेख बाट सबैलाई अवगत नै छ  येसो शुस्म  बिस्लेशण गरु त मदेशमा बसेका पहाडी र पहाडमा बसेका मदेशीको यिस्थिति के हिजोका भारतका मुस्लिम र पाकिस्तानका हिन्दु जस्तै गराउने हो मेरो बुजायी एती हो !! बाकी आर्को कुरा आफ्नो पहिचान खोज्दा आर्का को पहिचान को बारेमा नि सोच्नु न हो दाजुभाई हो ... के मदेस आन्दोलमा जस्तो गरि पहाडिया हरुलाई लखटने मदेशमा फेरी !! आज छदम पहाडियाले मदेसी लाई "मदिसे" "धोति" भने जस्तै भोलि जुन जातिको नामको प्रदेश को जनता जस्तै लिम्बु प्रदेशमा मदेशका जनतालाई "मदिसे धोति " भन्न सकिदैन भन्ने ग्यारेन्टी कसले दिन्छ, मदेशमा मगरहरुलाई "लिडेमगर" नभन्ला भन्न को ग्यारेन्टी गर्न सक्छ !! अज नेवार समुदाय हरेक जिल्ला को सदरमुकाम मा बसोबास गर्दै आएका छन् तपाईले जस्तो भनेको लिम्बुवानमा, खुम्बुवानमा, तमुवानमा, मगरातमा,खस राज्य मा थारुवान मा मिथिला मा नेवार लाई "ज्यापू" भनेर नबन्ला भन्ने ग्यारेन्टी को दिन सक्न्नु हुन्छ !! मैले भोलि को दिन द्खेको छु कालान्तर मा यो जातीयप्रदेशले माथि अबियक्त गरेका बुदाले देस नटुक्रियेला भन्न को सक्छ मलाई बुदागत रुप मा बताई दिनु होला ! हिजो जयथिति मल्लले काम को आधार मा ४ बर्णमा जनत लाई बिबाजित गरे तेस्को दुक्ख हामीले पाएका छौ ! भोलि लिम्बुवान नामक प्रदेशमा लिम्बु मात्र, खुम्बुवान नामक  देशमा खुम्बु जाति मदेश को नाम मा राखिएको नाम मा मदेशी मात्र बस्ने ठाउ हुन्छ र कालान्तरमा तेहा सबै प्रदेशमा एउटै जाती भएर मानौ १० प्रदेश बनायिये १० प्रदेश हुन्छ किन कि बहुमत हुन्छ नि त्यो ठाउमा ल आफै बुझ्नुस आहिले नभयेनी कालान्तरमा यो अवश्य हुन्छ !! र बाकी रहे १२० जाती हरु तिनको हालत के होला आफै बुज्नुस !! कुरा गहिरो छ नि साथी हो !! हामीले खस ले धेरै पढेका छौ तेही भएर राज्य को हरेक अंग मा छौ आहिले मदेशी /जनजातीहरु पनी माथि पुगेका छन् पढेका छन् !! मैले कुनै जात धर्म बिसेसले देश नटुक्रयायिदिनु होला धन्यबाद !!